NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 22 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AGAPITO GAMEZ GARCIA, AKA No. 20-71355 Agapito Gamez, Pete Agapito Gamez, AKA Agapito GamezGarcia, Agency No. A090-182-719 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted October 19, 2021 San Francisco, California Before: GOULD and BEA, Circuit Judges, and VITALIANO,** District Judge. 1. Petitioner Agapito Gamez Garcia (Gamez) seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision which affirmed an Immigration Judge (IJ) decision which denied his various applications for relief. For the following reasons, * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Eric N. Vitaliano, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. we deny-in-part and dismiss-in-part Gamez’s petition for review. 2. The parties are familiar with the facts of the case, so we do not recite them here. Gamez first argues that the BIA committed error when it affirmed the IJ’s decision to not hold a competency hearing pursuant to Matter of M-A-M-, 25 I. & N. Dec. 474 (BIA 2011). However, Gamez failed to submit any evidence that he merited a competency hearing. Accordingly, the BIA was correct to affirm the IJ’s decision not to hold a competency hearing pursuant to M-A-M-. 3. Gamez next argues that the BIA committed error when it determined that he failed to establish membership in three particular social groups (PSGs) which each required mental illness, even though he had prescriptions for medications that could be used as antidepressants. However, Gamez produced no documentation from a physician stating that he suffered from a mental illness. Moreover, both amitriptyline and sertraline, antidepressants prescribed to Gamez over the course of the past several years, have been demonstrated in peer-reviewed scientific articles to be effective in treating diabetic neuropathy, a chronic condition experienced by Gamez.1 Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Gamez failed to establish membership in three PSGs requiring mental illness. 1 See, e.g., M.B. Max et. al, Amitriptyline relives diabetic neuropathy pain in patients with normal or depressed mood, 37(4) Neurology 589 (1987); P.J. Goodnick et. al., Sertraline in diabetic neuropathy: preliminary results, 9(4) Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 255 (1997). 2 4. Gamez next argues the BIA committed error when it failed to afford him protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), in part by “improperly reject[ing] [588 pages of documents proffered as evidence] as untimely.” The BIA did commit error when it failed to address the IJ’s untimeliness rejection on the grounds that “respondent has not shown that he fears future persecution on account of a viable social group.” (emphasis added). This is legally incorrect, as the documents rejected by the IJ as untimely, which were submitted in support of Gamez’s Form I-589, applied as much to Gamez’s …
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals