NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 21 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUAN JR CABUJAT TEOCO and No. 16-72462 ERLINDA HISO TEOCO, Agency Nos. A099-735-203 Petitioners, A099-735-204 v. MEMORANDUM* JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 13, 2018** Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Juan Jr Cabujat Teoco and Erlinda Hiso Teoco, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider, where petitioners did not show the BIA made an error of law or fact in its prior decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (“A motion to reconsider shall state the reasons for the motion by specifying the errors of fact or law in the prior Board decision and shall be supported by pertinent authority.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 16-72462 16-72462 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Juan Teoco v. Jefferson Sessions 21 February 2018 Agency Unpublished b24b77733240b04ec8a1b3dd51e880a93cb65566
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals