Lilian Tah v. Merrick Garland


UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1331 LILIAN ANGUM TAH, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted: July 13, 2021 Decided: July 28, 2021 Before AGEE, KEENAN, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Denied in part, dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Jeffrey Bossert Clark, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Carly McIntyre, Assistant Director, Andrew Oliveira, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lilian Angum Tah, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her untimely motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and Tah’s claims and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). We therefore deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Tah (B.I.A. Feb. 20, 2020). We lack jurisdiction to review Tah’s challenge to the Board’s refusal to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen her proceedings. See Mosere, 552 F.3d at 400-01. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review in part with respect to this claim. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DENIED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART 2 20-1331 Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ca4 4th Cir. Lilian Tah v. Merrick Garland 28 July 2021 Unpublished 80757f93abe9049187a71ce046a5facc19a6be05

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals