NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 21 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RODRIGO RIOS-GONZALEZ, No. 16-72266 Petitioner, Agency No. A200-964-064 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 19, 2019** Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Rodrigo Rios-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Cabantac * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Holder, 736 F.3d 787, 792 (9th Cir. 2013). We deny the petition for review. The agency correctly determined Rios-Gonzalez’s conviction for possession for sale of a controlled substance, specifically cocaine salt, under California Health and Safety Code (“CHSC”) § 11351 is an aggravated felony. See Lopez v. Sessions, 901 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir. 2018) (using the modified categorical approach, court determined that a record of conviction reflecting a plea to CHSC § 11351 involving cocaine salt showed the alien had been convicted of an aggravated felony). As a result, he is ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C). Rios-Gonzalez’s contention that he would be eligible for Federal First Offender Act status is not persuasive, where he was convicted for possession for sale of a controlled substance, and where the record does not indicate his petition to have his conviction dismissed was ultimately granted. See Lopez, 901 F.3d at 1075-76 (Federal First Offender exception did not apply to conviction under CHSC § 11351). We are also not persuaded by Rios-Gonzalez’s contention that CHSC § 11351 punishes conduct not publishable by the federal equivalent. Rios-Gonzalez’s contention that the IJ erred in denying relief without securing the record of conviction is not supported, where the record of conviction is in the administrative record. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 16-72266 16-72266 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ca9 9th Cir. Rodrigo Rios-Gonzalez v. William Barr 21 February 2019 Agency Unpublished d96b833b9f594ae7466e22a920164c5dd3339286
Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals