Mohamed Siddiqui v. Merrick B. Garland

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-2748 ___________________________ Mohamed Shakeel Siddiqui Petitioner v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States Respondent ____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ____________ Submitted: August 16, 2022 Filed: August 19, 2022 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Indian citizen Mohamed Shakeel Siddiqui petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, upholding an immigration judge’s determination that he was inadmissible upon reentry to the United States.1 Having jurisdiction 1 Siddiqui does not challenge the adverse credibility determination; or denial of asylum, withholding of removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture, under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1252(d)(1) and 1252, and upon careful consideration, this court finds no basis for reversal. See Davila-Mejia v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2008) (this court reviews the BIA’s decision, as it is the final agency decision; and to the extent the BIA adopted the IJ’s findings or reasoning, also reviews the IJ’s decision). The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ cancellation of removal, and adjustment of status; accordingly, any challenges have been waived. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004) (where claim is not raised or meaningfully argued in opening brief, it is deemed waived). -2- 21-2748 Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ca8 8th Cir. Mohamed Siddiqui v. Merrick B. Garland 19 August 2022 Unpublished c84b8dea7c61bf32d575fb09cf9e17ac019bcc1c

Original document
Source: All recent Immigration Decisions In All the U.S. Courts of Appeals